WHAT HAPPENED

EUROFER says the planned reduction in free allocation is too rapid and proposes a slower phase-out over the next five years, followed by faster withdrawal once conditions supporting industrial decarbonisation are in place. The association argues that carbon pricing must be accompanied by competitive low-carbon energy, trade protection, lead markets, scrap access and investment support. Its position concerns a proposed ETS revision, not a measure established as finally adopted in the supplied claims.

MetalMate summary of the linked evidence
WHY IT MATTERS

Commercial context

The projected increase would materially raise costs for EU steelmakers during the transition to low-carbon production. EUROFER’s estimates suggest particularly acute pressure on conventional blast-furnace operations, potentially weakening investment economics and export competitiveness. The policy debate will therefore affect both the pace of decarbonisation and the commercial viability of European steel capacity.

MetalMate analysis
KEY DETAILS
  • EUROFER projects the sector’s annual carbon bill at approximately €8.2 billion in 2031, up by roughly €4.8 billion from about €3.4 billion in 2026.
  • It estimates carbon costs for conventional blast-furnace steel could reach around €100 per tonne in 2030 and exceed €200 per tonne from 2031.
  • Investment decisions have been taken for around 35 million tonnes of low-carbon steel projects, while projects representing more than 10 million tonnes of capacity have stalled, according to EUROFER.
  • EUROFER says the EU lacks an effective structural solution to protect steel exports from carbon leakage because European producers bear carbon costs on all output, while foreign producers face EU carbon costs only on sales into the EU.
WHAT TO WATCH

Watch whether EU policymakers alter the proposed timetable for withdrawing free allowances, and whether they introduce stronger export carbon-leakage protection or wider support for low-carbon energy, investment, scrap access and steel demand. Further project delays would indicate that transition costs are continuing to weaken low-carbon investment economics.

Source & methodology +

MetalMate separates original-source evidence from summary and analysis. Verify the original source before procurement, legal or engineering decisions.

Article status
Published · Version 1
Source date
Not supplied
MetalMate publication
11 October 2026
Verification
Automated evidence checks; not human reviewed

EU steel’s annual carbon bill could more than double to €8.2bn in the next 5 years despite green investments, industry warns — EUROFER
MetalMate provides an English summary; consult the original wording.