Gaz-System has finished driving more than 500 steel piles for the jetty that will carry the floating storage and regasification unit (FSRU) terminal in Gdańsk Bay. The company presents the package as delivered to its approved schedule and budget. Both claims are the investor's own, reported on trust rather than audited, and they matter less than what the milestone changes: the marine structural substructure is closed, and the critical path now runs through platform assembly, the subsea gas line and a vessel that is still being outfitted in Ulsan.

What the milestone actually closes

The piles "form the basis of the jetty structure and will support the platforms and enable the installation of all the equipment and systems necessary to operate the FSRUs", per Gaz-System. Łukasz Radomski of the GAP–FABE–UNITEK consortium put the sequence plainly: the driven steel is the foundation "on which the prefabricated jetty platforms will be mounted along with necessary equipment".

So this is the end of the substructure, not the end of the jetty. Gaz-System president Sławomir Hinc framed the next steps as platform assembly followed by "preparation for the construction of the subsea gas pipeline". Three packages remain on the marine side, and each carries its own weather-sensitive offshore window.

Hinc also conceded "difficult conditions and changeable weather conditions" in the Gulf of Gdańsk. That is the reason schedule reliability was headlined at all: a Baltic offshore campaign is a race against the autumn and winter sea state, and the consortium's deputy contract director identified logistics — "the delivery of materials, the availability of vessels and specialist equipment, and the work of teams at sea and on land" — as the hardest part of the job, not fabrication.

The steel question nobody has answered

The release gives no pile diameter, wall thickness, steel grade, driven length, tonnage or supplier. For a steel-facing readership that is the most conspicuous gap, because a jetty sized for an FSRU berth, marine loading arms and mooring loads implies heavy-wall large-diameter tubulars of a type that competes for the same mill capacity and the same piling spreads as Baltic offshore wind foundations.

An order-of-magnitude illustration, constructed by this author and not a reported figure:

Assumption (illustrative)Value
Outer diameter1.2 m
Wall thickness25 mm
Driven length35 m
Steel volume per pile (π × D × t × L)≈ 3.3 m³
Mass per pile at 7.85 t/m³≈ 26 t
500 piles≈ 13,000 t

Change any input and the number moves a long way: 1.5 m diameter with a 40 mm wall at 40 m driven length gives roughly 59 t per pile, or about 30,000 t for the fleet. Larger diameters, heavier sections or shorter drives could put the true figure anywhere in a wide band. Treat the calculation as a framing device for procurement significance, not as a disclosed tonnage.

What can be said with confidence is directional. This is a discrete, schedule-bound package of driven tubular steel on the Polish coast, awarded and executed inside a fixed marine window — a demand signal of the kind that matters to European pipe and tubular mills, and one that stacks with the pipeline and jetty steel still to come at Świnoujście and with the region's offshore wind build-out.

The rest of the integration work

Two parallel pieces of civil engineering are further along than the pile milestone suggests, and together they explain why Gaz-System can talk about a 2028 start-up with a straight face.

  • Microtunnel. Drilled in August 2026, over a kilometre long, routed beneath forest, dunes and beach at Górki Zachodnie. The gas pipeline connecting the offshore terminal to the onshore system will be laid inside it. The tunnel boring machine remains beneath the seabed, and retrieval preparations are under way — a reminder that "completed" here means the bore, not the whole crossing.
  • Onshore pipeline. The Gdańsk–Gustorzyn line underwent testing in September, reported to have confirmed workmanship and operating condition.

The method description in the public material is loose: press texts call a crossing of this length a "microtunnel", but the tunnelling technique and casing diameter are not stated. That distinction matters to anyone tracking line pipe specification for the interconnection.

Poland's second LNG gateway, and what it is for

The project is described as Poland's first FSRU and the second LNG terminal on the Polish coast, implicitly after the land-based Świnoujście facility. Its function is to offload seaborne LNG, regasify and hold regasified gas in process, creating "an additional entry point for natural gas" and diversifying supply.

Neither capacity (bcm/yr or mtpa), capex, contract value nor charter terms appear in the milestone release. Earlier public reporting has put the terminal in the range of several bcm/yr with a multi-year FSRU charter, but those figures could not be verified against primary documents for this article and should be treated as unconfirmed background. The same applies to the vessel's ownership structure; the release names the FSRU Solidarity and the outfitting yard in Ulsan, South Korea, and nothing more.

The schedule claim to watch is "commissioning scheduled for early 2028" — a target in a yard outfitting programme, not a demonstrated commitment. The Gdańsk works and the Korean outfitting must converge, and the retrieval of the TBM, platform lifts and subsea line all sit between now and then.

What to watch next

The next genuine information events, in rough order of usefulness:

  1. Award and specification details for the jetty platform package — the first real indication of structural steel quantities beyond the piles.
  2. The subsea pipeline construction start, which will reveal vessel spread and line pipe sourcing.
  3. TBM retrieval, a small but revealing test of how cleanly the onshore-offshore interface is being managed.
  4. Any disclosed terminal capacity or tariff decision, which determines whether Gdańsk is a marginal balancing tool or a material second gateway.

Until then, the most defensible reading is this: Gaz-System has bought itself schedule credibility at the hardest point of the marine programme, and has done so without telling the market how much steel it took to do it.

Source & methodology +

MetalMate separates original-source evidence from summary and analysis. Verify the original source before procurement, legal or engineering decisions.

Article status
Published · Version 1
Source date
21 October 2026
MetalMate publication
22 October 2026
Verification
Automated evidence checks; not human reviewed

Over 500 piles lay the foundation for Poland’s floating LNG terminal (Gallery) — Offshore Energy