Africa's steel output is growing roughly ten times faster than the global average, and its largest producer doubled its scrap imports in half a year. On the face of it, that looks like the clearest demand signal the global ferrous scrap trade has had in years. The ferrous panel at BIR's Málaga convention (25–27 October 2026) spent its session explaining why the reality is considerably more complicated — and why, for European exporters in particular, the window may already be narrowing.
What the numbers actually show
The statistics presented by BIR ferrous statistics adviser Rolf Willeke confirm a striking divergence. In the first half of 2026, global crude steel production fell 0.7% to 931.5 Mt, while African output rose 10% to 12.6 Mt. By the end of September, Africa had produced 19.0 Mt, up 9.7% year on year, according to worldsteel data. Egypt alone accounted for 5.7 Mt in H1, up 13.6%, making it both the continent's largest steelmaker and its largest scrap importer — purchases nearly doubled (+98.6%) to 2.1 Mt.
European suppliers captured most of that surge: EU-27 shipments to Egypt rose 96% to 1.106 Mt in H1. But the aggregate EU export picture is far less dramatic than that single number implies.
| EU-27 recycled steel trade, H1 2026 | Volume | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|
| Total extra-EU exports | 8.520 Mt | +4.5% |
| to Turkey | 5.446 Mt | −2.6% |
| to Egypt | 1.106 Mt | +96.0% |
| to India | 0.427 Mt | −11.8% |
| to Pakistan | 0.355 Mt | +41.2% |
| EU-27 scrap consumption | 38.138 Mt | −3.2% |
Source: BIR Ferrous Division, 17th edition of "World Steel Recycling in Figures", H1 2026 update.
The arithmetic matters. Egypt's additional ~0.54 Mt of EU scrap almost single-handedly accounts for the entire 0.37 Mt increase in total extra-EU exports. Strip Egypt out and European scrap exports were essentially flat to lower. This is not a story of broad-based export growth; it is a story of one market absorbing volume that Turkey and India shed.
Why EAF capacity is a poor proxy for scrap demand
The central analytical point from Atilla Widnell of Navigate Commodities is one that deserves more attention than it typically gets in trade commentary: electric arc furnace capacity does not map one-to-one onto scrap consumption. The charge mix is a commercial and technical choice, and in North Africa it is being made increasingly in favour of direct reduced iron.
- Algeria is the cleanest example. DRI-fed plants under development limit the need for imported scrap even as EAF capacity rises.
- Egypt has seen greater DRI availability that can displace part of the scrap burden in furnace charges, while a flood of Chinese finished steel is pressuring local mills' utilisation — and therefore their raw material appetite.
- Morocco is the counter-example: new EAF capacity there has genuinely supported scrap purchases and reduced reliance on imported semis for rerolling.
Widnell also drew the distinction that should be standard practice but rarely is in capacity announcements: announced projects are not operating plants. Construction timelines and gradual ramp-ups mean headline EAF capacity figures systematically overstate near-term scrap demand.
This has a direct read-across for anyone modelling African scrap imports off capacity databases. The relevant variable is not EAF tonnage but the DRI-to-scrap ratio in the charge — and in a region with abundant gas and increasingly available DRI capacity, that ratio has a structural bias toward the substitute.
The EU's 2027 waste list is the bigger swing factor
The panel's most consequential forward-looking discussion concerned regulation rather than metallurgy. Under Regulation (EU) 2024/1157, exports of non-hazardous waste to non-OECD countries are generally prohibited from 21 May 2027 unless the destination appears on the Commission's authorised-country list for the relevant waste stream. The Commission published its draft list on 18 September 2026, and it reportedly does not authorise Egypt or Morocco to receive metal waste.
The list is draft, subject to consultation, and had a statutory deadline for the first authorised-country list of 21 November 2026. But the direction of travel is clear, and Widnell outlined the likely consequences: Egypt and Morocco would turn increasingly to the United States and the United Kingdom — neither of which is bound by the EU regime.
There is already evidence of that substitution in the trade data. UK shipments to Egypt rose 62.8% to 0.804 Mt in H1 2026, and UK shipments to Morocco rose 26.4% to 0.607 Mt — growth rates that suggest UK exporters are positioning for exactly the scenario Widnell described. Widnell also flagged a distributional effect that matters for market structure: containerised traders, typically smaller operators, would be hit hardest, while bulk-scale suppliers retain more flexibility.
For European exporters, this is the strategic question of the next eighteen months. Egypt is currently the second-largest destination for EU scrap after Turkey; if the draft list is adopted unchanged, that volume must find a home in a European market where consumption is already falling (−3.2% in H1) or in a shrinking set of authorised destinations.
South Africa: a cautionary tale on export restrictions
The panel's discussion of South Africa's Price Preference System is the most useful empirical counterweight to the assumption that restricting raw material exports benefits domestic industry. The PPS requires scrap to be offered to domestic buyers at a discount before export, and exports carry an additional 20% duty.
Donald MacKay of XA Global Trade Advisors argued the measures benefit local consumers but depress prices and collection incentives. Quintin Starkey of the Metal Recyclers Association of South Africa quantified the damage: sector employment has fallen from 15,000 to 9,000, with coastal recyclers particularly exposed to transport costs to consumers concentrated around Johannesburg. South African scrap exports fell 33.5% to 0.11 Mt in H1 2026.
The lesson travels well beyond South Africa. Several African governments are considering or applying scrap export restrictions to support domestic EAF mills, and the South African experience suggests the arithmetic is rarely as favourable as it appears: cheaper domestic scrap for a handful of mills, against a shrinking collection base that ultimately constrains future supply.
A continent of four markets, not one
The consistent theme from division president Shane Mellor and Sanjay Mehta of MTC Group was that "Africa" is an unhelpful analytical unit. Mehta's four-region framing — northern, western, eastern and southern — reflects genuinely different stages of development. The practical constraints are as much logistical as metallurgical: road and rail links between African countries are severely inadequate, and river transport is not a reliable substitute, which means intra-African scrap trade remains marginal.
Abhijeet Mahanta of Stelaris Resources noted the reversal of roles in several markets from exporter to importer, citing a 300% increase in Nigerian scrap purchases within a year — albeit from a very small base that makes the percentage more dramatic than the tonnage.
Tom Bird of Enicor supplied the sober counterpoint: political instability, regulatory uncertainty and corruption are material barriers. "Trading is one thing," he said, "but putting hard dollars or euros into investment there is an entirely different matter." That distinction — between trading flows and capital commitment — neatly captures the asymmetry in Africa's scrap story. Trade can respond quickly; collection infrastructure, yards and processing capacity cannot, and they are what would ultimately generate the domestic scrap availability that Mehta expects over time.
What to watch
Three markers will determine whether Africa becomes the structural scrap demand centre the growth numbers imply:
- The final EU authorised-country list. Adoption in a form excluding Egypt and Morocco for metal waste would redirect roughly one million tonnes of annual EU supply toward the UK, the US and other origins within months.
- Egyptian EAF charge mix. If DRI displaces scrap faster than new capacity is added, the import surge of 2026 may prove a one-off rather than a trend.
- Chinese finished steel penetration. Continued import pressure on Egyptian and Moroccan mills would undermine utilisation and raw material demand regardless of capacity additions.
The headline growth is real, and Africa's young population and infrastructure deficit give it genuine long-run steel demand potential. But the 2026 scrap surge was substantially a European supply response to a single market's temporary tightness, layered on a regulatory deadline. Treating it as the start of a durable continental demand curve would be a mistake.
Figures are as reported by BIR and worldsteel unless otherwise attributed. Interpretations of the Egyptian and Moroccan trade shifts, and the assessment of future flows, are the panellists' views as reported; the framing of export concentration and substitution effects is MetalMate analysis.
Source & methodology +
MetalMate separates original-source evidence from summary and analysis. Verify the original source before procurement, legal or engineering decisions.
- Article status
- Published · Version 1
- Source date
- 29 October 2026
- MetalMate publication
- 29 October 2026
- Verification
- Automated evidence checks; not human reviewed
BIR convention in Malaga: Africa's potential to reshape global scrap flows — SteelOrbis
